<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Minimalist &#187; Products: Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theminimalist.net/category/products/good-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theminimalist.net</link>
	<description>Everything about less.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:59:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>All Small &amp; Mighty laundry detergent</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2006/01/17/all-small-mighty-laundry-detergent/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2006/01/17/all-small-mighty-laundry-detergent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve used All Free &#038; Clear laundry detergent for quite a while. It is available in a pretty inexpensive monster 200 oz container and seems to do a fine job on clothing, although we always wash on warm &#8211; tried once on cold, and jogging shirts were still stinky. Anyway, we live in an apartment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve used <a href="http://www.all-laundry.com/">All Free &#038; Clear laundry detergent</a> for quite a while. It is available in a pretty inexpensive monster 200 oz container and seems to do a fine job on clothing, although we always wash on warm &#8211; tried once on cold, and jogging shirts were still stinky. Anyway, we live in an apartment building with a laundry room in the basement, so the 200 oz was mighty inconvenient. Even normal 100 oz detergent bottles were a pain.</p>
<p><img align="right" src="/images/all.jpg" alt="all" />I saw the new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000AQAI5Q/sr=1-2/qid=1137359521/ref=sr_1_2/002-7450751-1150463?%5Fencoding=UTF8&#038;v=glance">All Small &#038; Mighty, Triple Concentrated Liquid Laundry Detergent, Free Clear</a> (yes, that&#8217;s a mouthful), which comes in a small container, more like a dish detergent bottle. It isn&#8217;t much more expensive than the normal stuff, and with coupons &#038; sales at CVS and Safeway, was actually much cheaper per load. I like the reduced packaging and resources used in shipping it to the store, as well  as reduced space taken up at home &#8211; in a small apartment, storing big detergent bottles is a pain. And even better, it is easy to put in the laundry basket and haul down to the basement of the building &#8211; much better than standard size detergent bottles.</p>
<p>But does it work? Yes. I make sure to let some water run into the washer, add the (surprisingly small amount of) detergent, let the water run for a few more seconds to mix things up, then add the clothes. They smell fine &#8211; no problems. This review says that it <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AKO3NAHPGO3DP/ref=cm_cr_auth/002-7450751-1150463">turned into an unpourable &#8220;thick gel&#8221;</a> after a while, so I&#8217;ve made sure to screw the cap on tightly. Hopefully we won&#8217;t have any such troubles, but you&#8217;ll hear about it here if we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2006/01/17/all-small-mighty-laundry-detergent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spork</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/27/spork/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/27/spork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/27/spork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only does this newly designed spork remove the need for two separate utensils, but it is also about as environmentally friendly as a disposable utensil is likely to get. Via Treehugger.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/07/moscardino_spor_1.php">this newly designed spork</a> remove the need for two separate utensils, but it is also about as environmentally friendly as a disposable utensil is likely to get.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.treehugger.com">Treehugger</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/27/spork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking the Prius so you can plug it into the wall</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/15/hacking-the-prius-so-you-can-plug-it-into-the-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/15/hacking-the-prius-so-you-can-plug-it-into-the-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, hybrid is a good thing. I&#8217;ve been following the story of the folks who created a kit to allow you to plug in your Prius and then run it 100% on battery to get phenominal gas mileage. Some people ask why Toyota didn&#8217;t just make it an option. I think they made the right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, hybrid is a good thing. I&#8217;ve been following the story of the folks who created a kit to allow you to <a href="http://wired.com/news/autotech/0,2554,68101,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_4">plug in your Prius and then run it 100% on battery</a> to get phenominal gas mileage. Some people ask why Toyota didn&#8217;t just make it an option. I think they made the right choice for the broader market &#8211; they made it work <em>just like a standard car</em>, removing one of the possible pieces of opposition to adopting the technology. In addition, there are some significant additional costs, like more battery storage, that would make it non-trivial to add.</p>
<p>But I think we&#8217;re almost ready for it as a manufacturer option in the next few years &#8211; once people really internalize that they can use it just like a normal car, having the plug-in option to really crank that gas bill down will probably be a welcome improvement. Until then, the enthusiast hacker market can get it from <a href="http://www.edrivesystems.com/">EDrive</a> right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/15/hacking-the-prius-so-you-can-plug-it-into-the-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topeak Bikamper</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/14/topeak-bikamper/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/14/topeak-bikamper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/14/topeak-bikamper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re biking across the country or something, you may need to camp out. You could carry a full tent, but the Topeak Bikamper cuts down on weight and bulk by using your bike as a support. I love dual-use like this &#8211; making the most use out of what you have. Gizmodo is apparently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re biking across the country or something, you may need to camp out. You could carry a full tent, but the <a href="http://topeak.com/sub/news.html">Topeak Bikamper</a> cuts down on weight and bulk by using your bike as a support. I love dual-use like this &#8211; making the most use out of what you have. Gizmodo is apparently wrong on the price though &#8211; they said $300, but the Topeak.com website indicates a suggested retail of $219. Still darn expensive, but a good idea.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/vehicles/topeak-bikamper-111259.php">Gizmodo</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/14/topeak-bikamper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easiest wristwatch I&#8217;ve seen (yet)</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/11/easiest-wristwatch-ive-seen-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/11/easiest-wristwatch-ive-seen-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we can put men on the moon, why is it still fiddly to get watch batteries replaced and keep synced to the current time? There is lots of technology in this new watch mechanism, since it is solar powered and automatically sets its time from radio signals in three different countries. With technology, less [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we can put men on the moon, why is it still fiddly to get watch batteries replaced and keep synced to the current time? There is lots of technology in this <a href="http://www.epson.co.jp/e/newsroom/2005/news_2005_07_07.htm">new watch mechanism</a>, since it is solar powered and automatically sets its time from radio signals in three different countries. With technology, less is often more &#8211; getting the latest gadgets doesn&#8217;t always simplify our lives. But when done correctly, more can be less &#8211; with more technology, we can (sometimes) have less to fiddle with and worry about. This is a good thing &#8211; but when will it <a href="http://www.omegawatches.com/omega/wo_space_x33">work on a Mars base</a>? What time is it there anyway?</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.i4u.com/article3827.html">I4U</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/11/easiest-wristwatch-ive-seen-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LED light goes for a year on one battery</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/08/led-light-goes-for-a-year-on-one-battery/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/08/led-light-goes-for-a-year-on-one-battery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 19:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pak-Lite is a LED light that simply clips on to the top of a 9V battery. They claim that in low power mode, it lasted for a year continuously on a lithium 9V battery. Pretty impressive. 9V batteries may be less convenient than the more standard AA size, but in addition to being able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.9voltlight.com">Pak-Lite</a> is a LED light that simply clips on to the top of a 9V battery. They claim that in low power mode, it lasted for <a href="http://www.9voltlight.com/pak_lite_testing">a year continuously on a lithium 9V battery</a>. Pretty impressive. 9V batteries may be less convenient than the more standard AA size, but in addition to being able to give your tongue a good jolt, they are conveniently shaped to form a flashlight handle. They suggest using your old smoke detector batteries, which probably have some juice left in them.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m waiting for a good LED light for my home that charges via solar during the day, and gives off light like a candle at night. Nothing to plug in, no cables, no chargers&#8230;cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/08/led-light-goes-for-a-year-on-one-battery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12,500 mpg car</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/06/12500-mpg-car/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/06/12500-mpg-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, this &#8220;car&#8221; is really small, and it may or may not handle hills. There is no cargo space &#8211; in fact, I don&#8217;t think you can carry anything in your pockets, and you have to be a 13 year-old or horse jockey to fit into it. But it apparently really does get 12,500 mpg. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/07/04/eco.car/index.html?section=cnn_tech">this &#8220;car&#8221; is really small, and it may or may not handle hills</a>. There is no cargo space &#8211; in fact, I don&#8217;t think you can carry anything in your pockets, and you have to be a 13 year-old or horse jockey to fit into it. But it apparently really does get 12,500 mpg. Wow.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/07/ecocar_more_eff.php">TreeHugger</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/06/12500-mpg-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vibrating wristwatch</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/01/vibrating-wristwatch/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/01/vibrating-wristwatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/01/vibrating-wristwatch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many times have you been at a movie, in a lecture, or on the train and heard someone&#8217;s watch beeping? And have them not even notice? Grrrrr. This Casio GW-400J vibrating watch (covered at Watch Report) makes too much sense &#8211; you feel it vibrate, and nobody else knows. My wife&#8217;s analog/digital combo watch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times have you been at a movie, in a lecture, or on the train and heard someone&#8217;s watch beeping? And have them not even notice? Grrrrr. This <a href="http://www.watchreport.com/2005/06/review_of_the_c.html">Casio GW-400J vibrating watch</a> (covered at <a href="http://www.watchreport.com/">Watch Report</a>) makes too much sense &#8211; you feel it vibrate, and nobody else knows. My wife&#8217;s analog/digital combo watch once started beeping and wouldn&#8217;t stop. I had to get out tools and pry the back off and remove the battery to get it to stop. I now have a watch that has no beeping capability at all, to make SURE that never happens to me.</p>
<p>Maybe if they make this thing smaller and less dorky, my next watch will vibrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/07/01/vibrating-wristwatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet telephones &#8211; FAQ</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/30/internet-telephones-faq/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/30/internet-telephones-faq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the idea, but haven&#8217;t done it yet &#8211; I get free long distance on my cellphone, and since I&#8217;m a social recluse, I just don&#8217;t talk that much anyway. Our landline has the ringer shut off since we only use it for DSL. But I know that eventually we&#8217;ll go with VOIP, if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea, but haven&#8217;t done it yet &#8211; I get free long distance on my cellphone, and since I&#8217;m a social recluse, I just don&#8217;t talk that much anyway. Our landline has the ringer shut off since we only use it for DSL. But I know that eventually we&#8217;ll go with VOIP, if only to get rid of another annoying monthly bill. <a href="http://www.lifehacker.com/software/internet-phones/frequently-asked-questions-about-internet-phones-110539.php">Lifehacker </a>points us to this <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2005/06/27/talkischeap.html">good FAQ</a> on how to do it. Still too confusing, but it is getting better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/30/internet-telephones-faq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IMAP is better email</title>
		<link>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/29/imap-is-better-email/</link>
		<comments>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/29/imap-is-better-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minimalist J</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products: Good]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theminimalist.net/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMAP lets you have the best parts of a corporate email server for your personal life. Jennifer Berger at MacWorld recently saw the light &#8211; you should take a look. As she says: IMAP lets me keep all my e-mail on my companyâ€™s e-mail server, along with any custom folders, and my Sent items. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMAP lets you have the best parts of a corporate email server for your personal life. Jennifer Berger at MacWorld <a href="http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/editors/2005/06/imap/index.php">recently saw the light</a> &#8211; you should take a look. As she says:</p>
<blockquote><p>IMAP lets me keep all my e-mail on my companyâ€™s e-mail server, along with any custom folders, and my Sent items. I can now find my way though any e-mail thread, no matter which machine Iâ€™m using. The downside of this situation, of course, and one that might make a lot of people nervous, is that everything is stored on a server unless you move items to your computer.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, if you use a client like <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a>, you can cache all the email locally and back it up to CD, avoiding the problem of having email only on the server. Once you have it all set up, it really is simpler than trying to fake everything through POP3 access. I&#8217;ve even moved my mom over to IMAP through <a href="http://www.fastmail.fm">Fastmail</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theminimalist.net/2005/06/29/imap-is-better-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
